COMMUNICATION on CONTEMPORARY ANTHROPOLOGY

Official journal of Shanghai Society of Anthropology eISSN1936-4458 pISSN1938-0580

中文
HOME
2008Vol.2
2007Vol.1
Authors' Guide
Editorial Board
Publishing Policy
Contact us
Resources
Site Map
COM.on C.A.2:e7/42-51 Online published on Nov. 27, 2008.
REPORT
Diversity Analyses on the Basic Vowel Qualities among the Human Languages
LI Hui
MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433 China; Laboratory for Human Polymorphism Studies, Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven CT06520 USA

ABSTRACT: Among the phonemes of human languages, vowels are much simpler than consonents and tones in structure, and therefore providing convenience of diversity analyses. Here basic vowel qualities of 621 languages/dialects were collected from the major linguistic families in the world. The basic vowel quality inventories vary from 2 to 20, and distributed unequally among the geographic regions. In the mass, the vowel inventories are mostly high in Eurasia and low in the Americas and Australia. The Germanic languages and Wu Chinese dialects have the highest vowel quality inventories. After digitizing the vowel qualities, the diversity of vowel quality systems of the world languages was analyzed by the method of NETWORK, which is usually applied to the mitochondrial DNA diversity in genetics. The network of the world vowel systems exhibits a single center expansion pattern, with the most common five-vowel system (aeiou) in the center, indicating that five-vowel system might be the most original vowel system of human languages. Different ways of complication or simplification from the five-vowel system might have resulted in the other types of vowel systems. The digitization of the phonemes will help in developing the field of linguistic statistics.
Key words: Vowel quality; Diversity; NETWORK analysis; Geographic distribution

Recieved: Nov.24,2008 Accepted: Nov.27,2008 Corresponding: LiHui.Fudan@gmail.com


 Full text: [PDF]


Supplement table 1 The basic vowel systems of the major languages in the world  [XLS]


  References


1.Ladefoged P (1993) A Course in Phonetics (Third Edition). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 197.

2.陈炳藻(1980)从词汇上的统计论《红楼梦》作者的问题.首届国际《红楼梦》研讨会.美国威斯康星大学,1980年6月16-20日.

3.Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37-48.

4.IPA(1999) Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.

5.Bao ZM (1999) The structure of tone. New York: Oxford University Press.

6.Benedict PK(1984)Austro-Tai Parallel, A Tonal Chamic Language on Hainan. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Language 22:83-86.

7.Daniels PT, Bright W (1996) The World's Writing Systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

8.Wright W (1971) A Grammar of the Arabic Language (3rd Ed). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

9.Hewitt BG (1979) Abkhaz. London: Routledge.

10.Maddieson I (2008) Vowel Quality Inventories. In: Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

11.van Oostendorp M (1999) Schwa in Phonological Theory. In: Cheng L, Sybesma R (eds) The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 431-462. ?

12. Garlén C (1988) Svenskans fonologi. Lund, Sweden: Studenlitteratur.

13. 钱乃荣(1992) 当代吴语研究.上海:上海教育出版社.

14. 金二新(2008)金汇续志(1985-2002.5),第二十一章社会生活,第六节方言.上海:上海辞书出版社.419-422.

15. Güldemann T,Vossen R (2000) Khoisan. In: Heine B, Nurse D (eds) African languages: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.99-122.

16. Li H, Cai X, Winograd-Cort ER, Wen B, Cheng X, Qin Z, Liu W, Liu Y, Pan S, Qian J, Tan CC, Jin L (2007) Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population differentiation in southern East Asia. Am J Phys Anthropol 134:481-488.

17. Bengtson JD (2001) Genetic and Cultural Linguistic Links between Burushaski and the Caucasian Languages and Basque. The 3rd Harvard Round Table on Ethnogenesis of South and Central Asia, Harvard University, May 13, 2001.

18. Casule I (2003) Evidence for the Indo-European Laryngeals in Burushaski and Its Genetic Affiliation with Indo-European. J Indoeuropean Studies 31: 21-86.

19. Bomhard AR, Kerns JC(1994) The Nostratic Macrofamily: A Study in Distant Linguistic Relationship. Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.

20. Krishnamurti B (2003) The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

21. Breen G (2001) The wonders of Arandic phonology. In: Simpson J, Nash D, Laughren M, Austin P, Alpher B (Eds) Forty Years On: Ken Hale and Australian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 45-69.

22. Leeding VJ (1989) Anindilyakwa phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.

23. 李辉(2008)兰坪县普米语拉丁字母拼写方案设计和应用.第二届全国少数民族青年自然语言处理学术研讨会.安徽,合肥,2008年10月7-9日. 37-43.

24. 欧亨元(2004)侗汉词典. 北京: 民族出版社.

25. Kaplan LD (1981) Phonological Issues in North Alaskan Inupiaq. Alaska Native Language Center research papers, no. 6. Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Native Language Center.

26. Cusihuamán A (2001) Gramática Quechua Cuzco-Collao. Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos "Bartolomé de Las Casas".